Difference between revisions of "List of legal cases relating to penalties"

From Consumer Wiki
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Cleanup|date=June 2007}}
+
 
  
 
[http://www.ico.gov.uk/global/search_results.aspx?search=Durant+v+Financial+Services+Authority+%5b2003%5d+EWCA+Civ+1746 Durant v Financial Services Authority [2003] EWCA Civ 1746]<br>The ‘Durant’ Case and its impact on the interpretation of the Data Protection Act 1998
 
[http://www.ico.gov.uk/global/search_results.aspx?search=Durant+v+Financial+Services+Authority+%5b2003%5d+EWCA+Civ+1746 Durant v Financial Services Authority [2003] EWCA Civ 1746]<br>The ‘Durant’ Case and its impact on the interpretation of the Data Protection Act 1998
Line 32: Line 32:
 
[http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2002/18.html Cave v Robison Jarvis & Rolf]Case law relevant to limitations<br>
 
[http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2002/18.html Cave v Robison Jarvis & Rolf]Case law relevant to limitations<br>
 
[http://www.uniset.ca/lloydata/css/1996AC102.html Sheldon v RHM Outhwaite]Case law relevant to limitations
 
[http://www.uniset.ca/lloydata/css/1996AC102.html Sheldon v RHM Outhwaite]Case law relevant to limitations
 +
[[Category:Legal_Information]]

Latest revision as of 16:52, 30 June 2007


Durant v Financial Services Authority [2003 EWCA Civ 1746]
The ‘Durant’ Case and its impact on the interpretation of the Data Protection Act 1998

Smith v Lloyds TSB 2003
Data Protection Act request and follows on from Durant

Woodchester Lease v Sawin & Co 1998
Default notices

Lordsvale Finance Plc -v- Bank of Zambia

Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Company Ltd -v- New Garage and Motor Company Ltd

Murray -v- Leisureplay Plc

Director General of Fair Trading v First National Bank
Important for interpretation of UTCCR regarding core terms being construed restrictively

Euro London Appointment Ltd v Claessens International Ltd

British and Irish Legal Information Institute
Free law data base covering mainly modern cases also covers statutes and statutory instruments.

Interfoto Picture Library v Stilletto
Important as it suggests the availability of the court to apply penalty provisions where there has been no breach of contract.

Jeancharm Ltd v Barnett Football Club
Interesting case regarding penalty interest

LB Hackney v Mullen

Various v Klienwort Case law relevant to limitations
Williams v Fanshawe Porter& HazelhurstCase law relevant to limitations
Cave v Robison Jarvis & RolfCase law relevant to limitations
Sheldon v RHM OuthwaiteCase law relevant to limitations